Behind the Wall of Stagnation

If we had opted for the Innovation Basic Income ten years ago, the world would look completely different today. We wouldn’t be stuck in a system where life-saving medicines disappear behind legal barriers and a handful of tech giants dictate the future of artificial intelligence. The past decade could have gone down in history as the ‘Great Acceleration’, a time when humanity stopped artificially restricting access to knowledge and chose genuine, collective progress instead. Unfortunately, we squandered those years on lawsuits and duplicated effort, yet this model shows us exactly how we can still fix the future.

How the Innovation Basic Income actually works

The concept behind the Innovation Basic Income completely transforms how we fund creativity and progress. Currently, we only promise inventors a temporary monopoly, via patents and copyrights, once they have already achieved success. This new model does the exact opposite by funding the creative process right at the starting line. It functions as an unconditional income and research grant for thinkers, builders, scientists, and artists. There is, however, one strict condition: everything you create becomes immediately and freely available to the public.

This idea rests on a solid economic foundation. It draws heavily on the work of Elinor Ostrom and the Commons movement, which demonstrated that communities often manage shared resources far more effectively than governments or corporations. It also adopts the philosophy of open-source software, we have long seen that technology improves much faster and more securely when thousands of people can build upon each other’s work, rather than working in isolation. Finally, it aligns with post-scarcity thinking. In a world of digitalization and automation, physical scarcity is a thing of the past, and withholding knowledge is essentially just a form of self-sabotage.

To see how this plays out in practice, one need only look at a modern medical lab. Instead of chasing venture capital that demands sky-high profits, a team of microbiologists receives an upfront innovation grant to develop a new antibiotic. Since their salaries and expenses are already covered, they publish the molecular design online the moment it is finished. This allows local factories around the world to immediately start producing the medicine at cost price. Similarly, a software engineer building a smart climate model does not need to hide their code behind a paywall, enabling scientists globally to instantly review and improve the tool. Even a local artisan experimenting with sustainable building materials can share their designs openly, allowing a community on the other side of the world to put them to use without fear of legal claims.

Why we need to act now

We may have missed that opportunity ten years ago, but the need to introduce a Basic Income for Innovation has only grown since then. The old intellectual property system is creaking at the seams, proving daily that it protects the establishment rather than fostering progress.

The greatest flaw of the current system is the massive waste of talent caused by everyone working in isolation on their own little islands. Companies spend billions reinventing the wheel behind closed doors, solely to beat the competition with a patent. With a pre-funded basic income, we stop working against one another and start building upon each other’s work, turning every solution into a building block for the next inventor. In this way, our focus shifts from profit to social value, simultaneously solving the problem of rare diseases going unresearched simply because there is too little money to be made from them.

Perhaps the most important argument is that this model protects our own freedom at a time when technology is taking over our lives. As we become increasingly tethered to AI, digital systems, and biometric software, it is perilous to leave these fundamental tools in the hands of trillion-dollar tech companies. Our digital future, and the systems upon which we all depend, must not be swayed by corporate quarterly results. They belong to us all, just like the roads we drive on and the water that flows from our taps.

Building an open future

Innovation does not belong in a vault, but in the public sphere, where it can inspire, challenge, and grow. Outdated patent and copyright rules no longer protect the creator’s stroke of genius, instead, they primarily safeguard the monopolies that profit from them and stifle our brightest minds.

About Dirk Jan Buter

I am a software developer, programmer, and the founder of Yvonta, based in Zwolle, The Netherlands. With a deep passion for low-level systems, custom software architecture, and the evolving intersection of AI and human digital persistence, I spend my time building specialized tools and exploring the technical and philosophical boundaries of digital autonomy. Writing and publishing are central to my work, but navigating them comes with a unique challenge: I live with dyslexia. To bridge the gap between complex architectural ideas and clear communication, I use AI as an active co-writer and editorial partner. This collaboration allows me to focus fully on the core concepts, logic, and perspective of my writing, ensuring my technical insights and independent editorial projects are shared with clarity and precision.