Let’s be honest: in general people are pretty stupid. I look at myself and see how little I actually understand and how many silly mistakes I make every day. But here’s the depressing part: apparently, according to statistics, I belong to the smarter half of this planet. That’s a terrifying thought.
If I consider myself a fool, and I am apparently one of the ‘smart ones’, how much trouble are the rest of us in? Now I finally understand why the world is slowly cycling towards damnation. We are collectively ignorant and biased, and we completely miss the point 99% of the time. At least, that is my experience with this strange species we call ‘human’.
Look at politics: citizens are furious with policy because they don’t understand it, and vice versa, leaders abuse power simply because they don’t know any better. I have an idealistic worldview that I would probably be better off throwing in the trash if a miracle doesn’t happen, but I sincerely believe that we can live together peacefully if we don’t constantly screw things up for each other.
Now take the punishments in the Netherlands. I think they are way too high. I can already see the angry faces: ‘How can you say that?’ Well, I mean it. The point is completely missed here due to a lack of empathy and human knowledge. Research shows that every person is capable of horrific things. People often come to these actions due to loneliness and a lack of social contact. Criminals do not become ‘bad’ from one day to the next, there is a lot of misery that precedes that. I always say: perpetrators are also victims. Their actions can almost always be traced back to a point where things went wrong, and it is often understandable.
I refuse to believe in punishment for revenge or as a deterrent. I believe in restorative justice. If we eliminate revenge from our justice system, we can finally tackle the source and repair the damage where it can still be done.
That is why I am so happy with the developments in AI. I hope AI gives us time to work on ourselves, to erase traumas and shortcomings and become better people. When we use that time for awareness and peace, hatred and retaliation finally give way to love and forgiveness through restoration.
But let’s be honest: as long as we are stuck with so-called ‘people’s representatives’ who only serve their own agenda, we will get nowhere. Just get rid of that whole meal. Step one to the peace we crave is a true democracy. Not a slow play in The Hague, but a digital system in which the voices of all citizens are immediately collected. A platform where we determine policy together and finally really take each other into account.
And if we are knocking down sacred cows, we need to adjust our outdated beliefs. Religions have been telling us for centuries that we should grow and learn, only to throw it all away again in the grave. What nonsense. I am convinced that we are here to conquer death. That is our only real chance for survival: to defeat death and colonize space.
I know, I’m not the only one who thinks this, but sometimes it feels like I’m talking to a wall. Everyone focuses blindly on their own right and does not look further than their big nose. So I say: I’m no saint, far from it, but really listen. Does anyone even hear me? Or would we rather continue cycling to damnation together?
Frequently Asked Questions
16 questions
The author admits to seeing little understanding and many daily mistakes in himself but notes that statistics place him in the smarter half of the planet. This realization terrifies him because it implies even greater ignorance among the rest of humanity. He concludes that collective stupidity explains why the world cycles toward damnation.
The author states that humans are collectively ignorant and biased and completely miss the point 99 percent of the time. He bases this on his experience with the species and observations of politics and justice. This widespread failure prevents peaceful coexistence.
Citizens become furious with policies they do not understand, while leaders abuse power simply because they lack knowledge. The author sees this as a core example of collective ignorance driving societal problems. He believes both sides fail to grasp the full picture.
The author argues that punishments in the Netherlands are far too high and should shift from revenge or deterrence to restorative justice. He wants the system to address root causes like loneliness and trauma instead of inflicting further harm. Eliminating revenge would allow repair of damage where possible.
Research shows every person is capable of horrific things, often triggered by loneliness and lack of social contact. Criminals do not become bad overnight but follow a path of preceding misery. The author therefore views perpetrators as victims whose actions trace back to earlier failures.
He refuses to accept revenge or deterrence as valid goals because they ignore human empathy and knowledge. Restorative justice instead targets the source of problems and repairs harm. This approach aligns with his belief that understanding the backstory makes punishment for its own sake unjust.
AI could free people from routine burdens and give them time to work on erasing traumas and shortcomings. With that time devoted to awareness and peace, hatred and retaliation could yield to love and forgiveness. The author sees this as a path toward becoming better people.
He calls for replacing current politicians with a true digital democracy that instantly collects every citizen's voice. Policy would be decided collectively on a platform that ensures mutual consideration. Removing self-serving representatives is essential before progress can occur.
He dismisses them as a slow play where representatives serve only their own agendas rather than the people. This prevents real democracy and blocks the peace that comes from genuine inclusion. A digital system is proposed as the direct alternative.
Religions are criticized for promising growth and learning yet discarding everything at death. The author finds this contradictory and nonsensical. He advocates replacing such views with the goal of conquering death.
Conquering death and colonizing space represent the only real chance for long-term survival. He notes that others share this view but feels most people focus narrowly on immediate concerns. Without this focus, humanity continues toward collective ruin.
The author rejects the idea that criminals are simply bad people who deserve harsh punishment. Instead, their actions almost always stem from earlier points where things went wrong. This makes empathy and restoration more appropriate than retaliation.
By placing himself in the smarter half yet still feeling foolish, he infers that average and below-average individuals create even greater trouble. Politics, justice, and daily interactions all suffer from this shared ignorance and bias. The result is a world drifting toward damnation.
Their crimes can be traced to prior misery, loneliness, or social failures that made horrific actions understandable. No one becomes criminal overnight without preceding causes. Recognizing this history supports restorative rather than punitive responses.
People lack empathy and human knowledge, which causes them to miss the point in justice, politics, and relationships. This leads to excessive punishments and failure to address root causes. The author sees this deficiency as widespread and self-perpetuating.
He admits he is no saint but asks whether anyone truly listens to his call for listening, awareness, and change. He wonders if society prefers to continue toward damnation together rather than pursue restoration and peace. The plea underscores his sense of speaking to an unresponsive audience.
Generated by AI to give you complete answers about this topic.
Leave a Reply